[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

• What if? - Authored by: feldegast on Monday, August 27 2012 @ 09:12 PM EDT
  • What if? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 27 2012 @ 09:47 PM EDT
• Srsly? You can't find one thing? - Authored by: celtic_hackr on Monday, August 27 2012 @ 11:39 PM EDT
  • From the Bloomberg interview .. - Authored by: nsomos on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 12:03 AM EDT

Samsung can ask the judge to rule on a motion to give them judgment as a matter of law, in effect saying so reasonable jury could find as they did. Or, if that doesn't work, it can appeal to the Federal Circuit. And if that doesn't work, it can ask the US Supreme Court to hear the matter.

If Samsung gets a new jury, do they get the reversal of small errors, as well as large ones?

If it gets a new jury, everything goes back to go, as far as trial matters beginning with day one. But they could get more than just a new jury. On appeal, Samsung can ask that the evidence not allowed in can be allowed in now, etc.

What about objections sustained in the first trial? Is there an expectation that the same evidence cannot be proffered in the new trial?

Yes, same, but not limited to that necessarily.

If the judge tries to rule from the bench, in lieu of a usable verdict, can Samsung demand a new jury?

I don't understand your question.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

• What if? - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 06:53 AM EDT