Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 12:04 AM EDT |
Sorry forget to sign.
Mouse the Lucky Dog.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 12:34 AM EDT |
n/t [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 01:09 AM EDT |
What I am wondering here is how did he even know that these
were different processors. I doubt this would have been part
of either side's presentation. Do I smell juror misconduct in
regards to doing unauthorized research ?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 03:51 AM EDT |
Difficult to understand how someone can hold the (wrong)
thought in one's head that prior art is invalid because it
is implemented on a different CPU, without holding the (also
wrong) idea that the patent is not infringed purely because
the alleged infringement is on a different CPU.
Interesting, I look forward to more from these guys.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|