Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

reduced to $1,049,343,540, down from $1,051,855 | 871 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

reduced to $1,049,343,540, down from $1,051,855

Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 03:26 PM EDT

PJ is arguing that the haste to come to a decision as
evidenced by those errors shows that the jury may not have
actually followed the instructions with due diligence.

Honestly though, do you think that you could, with all due
diligence, come to a conclusion with 11 other people on 700
questions in 21 hours? For the record, that's 1.8 minutes per
question.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

reduced to $1,049,343,540, down from $1,051,855

Authored by: PJ on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 06:35 AM EDT

That's correct. I have the right. I have
more than the right. I have the duty.

And my mistake, which was acknowledged and
corrected in public, didn't result in
a billion plus dollars being assessed in
damages to a company.

You seriously can't see the difference? The
mistakes were in the area of how much the
damages should be, and if that is off, someone
ends up paying more than is just.

If you don't care about justice under the law,
you probably shouldn't be reading Groklaw,
because that's what it's all about.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )