decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
reduced to $1,049,343,540, down from $1,051,855 | 871 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
reduced to $1,049,343,540, down from $1,051,855
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 12:48 AM EDT
Nice dodge, PJ. The air must be thin where you are, too.

See, people make mistakes, even when they have the luxury of their own bully
pulpit and no real pressure or accountability for their actions. More so, people

make errors even when they're experts in a profession and they're using their
cynical expertise to mock or call into question the competence of average
citizens of the United States who are fulfilling their civic duty under the
Constitution to decide matters presented to them in a Court of Law.

Seriously, it would take a jumbo jet full of attorneys at least six months to go

through each of those instructions, argue over every single cent, attempt to
settle every issue, and eventually crash the jumbo jet into a mountain because
they thought they could fly the plane better than the pilot. (Their surviving
partners would try to sue the airline and get billable hours out of it.)

That's why attorneys don't get to decide. They think they're never wrong and
have a hard time admitting it even when it's proven to them. In fact, they think

they grok the process so well, that they can second-guess and speculate about
the amateur jury's actions, even though their obvious error on .002857% of the
items is still a much better score than most attorneys can boast on their second

or third try at the Bar exam. As all Latin lovers know, "amateur" is
not a
derogatory word in this context but speaks to the citizen's love of duty to the

nation, surrendering family, home, job, and friends to do the duty to which they

are assigned.

If you'd like that percentage in dollars, I'm sure you can do that math. It's
mathematically similar to attorneys who overbill a client and the client
discovers
the overcharge and asks for a correction. Then the attorney immediately asks for

clarification but finds in his own records an error which he can correct before
the
reply comes, and of course the attorney expects the client to accept that it was

an honest mistake and not a sign of negligence or incompetence. (Okay, I made
that last part up. The attorney is just going to stonewall and threaten the
client
with a lien until the bill is paid in full.)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )