Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 01:31 PM EDT |
Overturn because of a 0.2% goof?
Not likely,[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 03:09 PM EDT |
PJ, you are allowed to misquote the actual damages figure by billions (both
yesterday and today) and you call it a 'Freudian slip.'
And yet you think the judgement should be overturn because 2 out of 700
questions/boxes were incorrectly filled by the jury?
If that's not a double standard (or worse strange bias), what is?
Nobody is perfect, even you, and so for you to try to mischaracterize the
jury's work because of two errors that they quickly fixed is a tad
disappointing. But you have the right to do so since this is your site. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- reduced to $1,049,343,540, down from $1,051,855 - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 03:26 PM EDT
- reduced to $1,049,343,540, down from $1,051,855 - Authored by: PJ on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 06:35 AM EDT
|
|
|