|
Authored by: jheisey on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 10:27 PM EDT |
Samsung might want to get a new law firm also so they prevent the jury ending up
with a patent holding forman.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Torinir on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 04:04 AM EDT |
Indeed. There's significant jury misconduct issues in this trial.
At a bare minimum, there's improper jury discussion, because the jury relied on
a juror's personal experience/expertise, which is not permitted.
As well, there's prejudgment, since the foreman stated the jury agreed that
Samsung was at fault after day 1, without accounting for any evidence presented
after that.
You can include extra-record evidence if the Google email wasn't part of the
evidence presented at trial.
Three major misconduct issues, each alone being sufficient for a mistrial.
---
Gaming like it's going out of style.
West/Zampella vs Activision should be covered on Groklaw. :o[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|