Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

You forget, it doesn't run iOS | 871 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

You forget, it doesn't run iOS

Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 27 2012 @ 12:11 PM EDT

I absolutely fail to understand how they could be regarded as similar. It's
like claiming that a given handbag copies a Louis Vuitton model -- but instead
of zippers it has buttons.

Oh, and "LV" is not there, but a different logo; and that's even
before you use the product for its intended purpose -- (and try to open the bag)
which usability is a condition for the sale to hold.

No, the OS is not something that is accessory or invisible. I certainly would
return an iPad-looking-like-a-Samsung as soon as I discover the existence of the
walled garden; and the retailer would have to refund, if I stated that my
intention was to use this for software development (or watching Flash movies, or
keeping my privacy intact)

This would only have sense if everyone believes that Apple products are bought
in order to be put in a glass case and never to be turned on. Well, maybe it's
their intention, after all.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )