decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Will a Samsung move to stock Android 4.1 solve this? | 871 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
There were also "patents" on the look of the hardware itself
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 05:13 PM EDT
Such as "rectangle with rounded corners" "speaker on top,
single round button at bottom" (which I think have lots of
prior art, but maybe not the combination of both as my
search for the combination came up empty).

So Samsung may have to change the physical appearance of
their products to look excessively different from the
iPhone/iPad in order to escape the injunction which is about
to be issued in a rush process where Judge Kuh (whose name
is German for "cow") just shortened the schedule from one
month to one day.

Example 1: The Compaq/HP iPaq had speaker on top, camera on
back, single round button at bottom, but it was not a
symmetric rounded rectangle.

Example 2: The HTC Diamond had speaker on top, camera on
back, single visible round button at bottom and is a
symmetric rectangle, but it isn't rounded and post-dates the
iPhone anyway.

Example 3: Samsung phones like the S2 and the S3
consistently tries to keep the light in the extra touch
buttons left and right of the round button turned off, which
makes them much harder to use ("Where is that button now on
this model"), but makes it *look* more like a button-
deprived iPhone.

Example 4: I would suggest buttons that are entirely on the
sides of the phone (leaves more room for the screen too),
sides that are entirely oval and all different, like on
natural beach stones, all plugs and the lanyard hook at the
top and a non-black/white color that reflects the bundled OS
"green for Android, silver for Windows Mobile classic, beer-
yellow for Brew, Finland-light-blue for Meego and other
binary Linux, London bus red for Symbian/Psion, puke-
yellowish-brown for Windows Phony and Windows RoT 8".

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Will a Samsung move to stock Android 4.1 solve this?
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 27 2012 @ 11:01 AM EDT
I was thinking the same thing, actually hoping for it. In the past I've avoided
Samsung because of their Touch Wiz interface. Recently we chose a Galaxy Nexus
for my wife instead of a GS3 because we wanted the UI to match her GN7 even
though I would have much rather gotten the GS3 for the hardware.

JT

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )