decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Thats easy- 91 pages of instructions. | 871 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Jury in Apple v. Samsung Goofed, Damages Reduced -- Uh Oh. What's Wrong With this Picture? ~pj
Authored by: micheas on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 02:02 PM EDT

Because if they had not raised the inconsistencies they would have lost their right to appeal on those inconsistencies.

This is the no gotcha rule, so to speak.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Thats easy- 91 pages of instructions.
Authored by: jesse on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 02:11 PM EDT
Easy. 91 pages of instructions

It takes at least a couple of hours to just skim the thing once.

To actually read, cross reference with the evidence, and create an answer for
the form would take about an hour per entry.

Now multiply by the number of entries. I believe it comes out to several days.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Jury in Apple v. Samsung Goofed, Damages Reduced -- Uh Oh. What's Wrong With this Picture? ~pj
Authored by: ais523 on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 08:07 PM EDT
I think they could have made a good guess that the inconsistencies would be
there, based simply on how fast the verdict form came back. It's quite hard to
fill in a form that long without making mistakes somewhere, after all.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )