decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Samsung Juror Speaks Out | 871 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Samsung Juror Speaks Out
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 03:18 PM EDT
sounds like someone needs a good beating with the clue stick (with a nail in).

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The foremans patent
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 04:21 PM EDT
Has anyone looked at Velvin Hogan patent? a clicky link. There doesn't seem to be much novel or new, just cobbling together some existing technologies in a way that wasn't new. At the time that patent was registered, I was repairing the second generation Pace satellite receiver with a record to hard drive feature, encrypted on the drive for copyright protection, so the signal had to be decrypted before play etc, and that is the second generation in NZ, with HD that the earlier model didn't have. Quite possibly there were earlier models that we never saw in NZ. It seems to me to be rather vague with specific implementation, just patenting an idea. Dave

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Samsung Juror Speaks Out
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 04:59 PM EDT

From link:

Manuel Ilagan, one of the nine jurors who ruled in favor of Apple, tells CNET he thought Samsung's internal e-mails about incorporating some of Apple's technology into its devices, and the evasive way Samsung executives answered questions, was damning.
The way Apple had Samsung sanctioned for not keeping evidence when Apple itself only started keeping evidence much after Samsung when Apple was the plaintiff is damning.

A pity that Samsung didn't press for Apple not only to be Sanctioned as well but also harder for failing to keep evidence until much after they did.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"In fact we skipped that one [patent], so we could go faster. It was bogging us down." OMG!?
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 08:08 PM EDT
The juror discussing the "guidance" received from the patent-expert
juror foreman...

"After we debated that first patent -- what was prior art --because we had
a hard time believing there was no prior art."

"In fact we skipped that one," Ilagan continued, "so we could go
on faster. It was bogging us down."

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )