|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 07:50 PM EDT |
What evidence do you have that "Apple is a company built
on the hard work or people who didn't work for Apple."?
I too read the recounts of this trial. There were opposing views presented
by each party. There was very clear evidence that Samsung's products
become largely similar to Apple's following the release of the iPhone.
Samsung presented evidence that it created thee on their own, but whether
to believe that (or Apple's testimony) is a matter of opinions, not a matter of
law. This jury obviously thought that Apples's case was more believable.
Still, your accusation that Apple " has tried to steal the work
product of people it has no business relationship with, and without
compensation or acknowledgment." Is done without ANY supporting
evidence to back it up. It is unclear if you are referring to Apple's proported
use of standard essential patients for some parts of the 3G standard or
something else all together. Perhaps you are accusing Apple of taking
your technology without acknowledgement or compensation. It isn't at all
clear. If it is the 3G SECs there is strong evidence that they purchased
licensed technology from Intel. Imagine some company claiming that you,
personally, are violating a 3G patient because you bought a phone from
company X. Shouldn't you be able to defend yourself that company X has a
license for the technology or should you, personally, have to pay again for
each and every patient in that phone.
From your message is sounds if you are just an Apple hater rather than
making an informed or reasoned argument.
No doubt some will find fault in my reasoning. Or maybe you will point to
other areas where Apple has appeared to be a bully. In any case this topic
is related to the Apple v Samsung trial, not some other real or imagined
slight. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
