|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 01:51 PM EDT |
The beauty of the information age is that now a lot of people will know the
issue. Even if Koh doesn't do a thing the situation is exposed.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 05:36 PM EDT |
| To those facts you will apply the law as I give it to you.
The
problem that can occur is that the judge is not honest.
Especially in the
situation of omission.
---
You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 08:40 PM EDT |
"You must follow the law as I give it to you whether you agree with it or
not"
Half-accurate. The fact is that if the judge gives the jury inaccurate
instructions about the law in a criminal case, the jury is absolutely allowed
and required to use the correct version of the law in their deliberations.
Just because the judge can answer "questions of law" doesn't mean he
is allowed to order the jury to misinterpret the law, because the jurors have an
*independent* duty to follow the law.
I believe the jury is allowed to read a copy of the relevant law.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
