decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Might not qualify | 871 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Apple stealing IP
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 27 2012 @ 04:01 PM EDT
Their corporate person should be thrown in jail for this blatant theft.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Might not qualify
Authored by: stegu on Monday, August 27 2012 @ 04:19 PM EDT
But that is not "on a smartphone" or "on a touchscreen".
Considering how the USPTO seems to grant new patents for
old and well known methods as long as they are performed
"on a computer", I am not sure this would count as prior
art to the patent office. It should, but it might not.

Remember how Apple made a mockery of the DiamondTouch
table display that Samsung brought before the court?
They said that it could not constitute prior art because
"you would have a hard time putting that in your pocket".
My blood boiled when I read that. Smoke and mirrors,
and a spinning dance to confuse the jury.

I'm surprised nobody has patented the icon, the cursor
and even the pixel, only now - amazingly - on a smartphone
touchscreen. Magic. How on Earth did someone ever
come up with such a brilliant idea? Imagine what effort
it must have taken, and how much money they deserve
to make to turn a profit on that huge R&D investment.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )