decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Let's be fair with Judge Koh | 871 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The wisdom of Judge Alssup
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 03:06 PM EDT
why do you think the foreman's status as a patent holder results in inevitable
bias against samsung?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Let's be fair with Judge Koh
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 27 2012 @ 03:12 AM EDT
Yes, as was Judge Alsup, Judge Koh also was a patent
litigator for tech companies when she was a partner at
McDermott Will Emery. In fact, she was on the team for
Creative Tech against Apple in which Apple paid Creative
$100M in payment. Here's a good article on Judge Koh's
career. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57497096-
37/apple-v-samsung-why-is-judge-koh-so-angry/

As far as her being biased or mishandling the case, I'm not
so sure about that either. She's tried desperately until
the last second for the parties to narrow the case for the
jury. I don't know what more she could've done. In
addition, even though she may be a little too strict with
case management, as a former patent litigator maybe she's
aware of risk of opening the floodgate and losing control of
the courtroom. I don't think she's favoring Apple either.
She denied Apple's preliminary injunction request last year,
which was a huge blow for Apple. Her opinion was well-
reasoned and you can tell she knows her stuff. It was only
after the Appeal's court reversed that she granted an
injunction against Galaxy Tab. If she really had it against
Samsung, she could've dealt them a big blow then. It should
also be noted that she reversed the Magistrate's ruling in
regard to adverse inference instruction. If anything, I
think it was the Magistrate who might have favored Apple.

Maybe 25 hours weren't enough and prejudicial for Samsung.
I also disagree with her preliminary injunction ruling on
Galaxy Nexus in a separate case. However, I also don't
think it's fair to characterize her as inexperienced in
patent litigation or is not being impartial because that
just isn't true. I just hope she's gutsy enough to impeach
that farce of a verdict in a month's time.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )