Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

If that patent is the foreman's that explains the problem | 871 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

If that patent is the foreman's that explains the problem

Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 07:51 PM EDT

From Bloomberg, foreman verbatim quote:

“When I got in this case and I started looking at these patents I considered:
‘If this was my patent and I was accused, could I defend it?’” Hogan explained.
On the night of Aug. 22, after closing arguments, “a light bulb went on in my
head,” he said. “I thought, I need to do this for all of them.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-25/apple-samsung-jury-foreman-says-google-
e-mail-persuasive.html

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

If that patent is the foreman's that explains the problem

Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 08:03 PM EDT

After this, someone will attempt (and probably prevail) to invalidate his
patent. A sleazy move but it will probably happen. He painted a target on that
one all by himself.

Not the sharpest knife in the drawer I'd say.

3514v
posting from public terminal

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

better - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 03:53 AM EDT
- Not necessarily...remember a patent is a license to sue...does not *REQUIRE* you to do so.. - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 10:29 AM EDT
  - Probably not good idea to go after him. - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 10:45 AM EDT
    - Probably not good idea to go after him. - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 08:29 PM EDT
  - Leave the poor sot alone. - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 04:00 PM EDT
    - Leave the poor sot alone. - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 08:38 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )