|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 04:07 PM EDT |
Did you forget to read the part where the jury used information from outside the
trial and even skipped the part about validity?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: BitOBear on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 07:22 AM EDT |
Did you also miss the part where members of the jury were giving engineering and
legal advice to the other members, or that once the foreman told them about his
patent and gave them his (expert testimony?) version of how patents work then
everybody in the jury knew how to vote without those pesky instructions?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: gdeinsta on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 01:25 PM EDT |
If anything the juror's comment makes me think that the jury did not consider
the actual legal questions at all. They just assumed that copying is bad and
punished Samsung for copying, not for infringement.
This also explains
why they did not punish Apple for infringing Samsung's patents, patents that
have stood up in other courts. They didn't consider that following a standard is
copying - but it may well be infringement. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
