decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Apple zealots need to get a grip | 871 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Will you learn your lesson?
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 11:25 AM EDT
What would you say if you needed to use different gestures to operate the
different cars?

A false analog is never right!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Samsung will have to learn its lesson
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 11:35 AM EDT
I don't think that your analogy works.

It would be more like if Ferrari had a patent on designing
cars with four wheels, and a jury said it was valid.

Nevermind that carriages and the Model-T existed before
it...



[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Samsung will have to learn its lesson
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 11:50 AM EDT
This is a painfully bad analogy. What if cars were required to
have square steering wheels? Or if some cars were required to
place the driver's seat on the opposite side of the car? Or if
the placement of ticker etc... were all required to be
different.

It is very disappointing that American innovation is now
labeled as things like slide to unlock, rounded corners, and
bounce back. What have we become?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Interesting concept, but not applicable
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 03:42 PM EDT
TSamsung phones do not look like Apple's phones.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple zealots need to get a grip
Authored by: AH1 on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 06:14 PM EDT
As much as you want to believe that your products are "like Ferrariā€™s your
products are closer to the old American Motors Corporation designs. Unique,
reasonable performing, and FULL of other peoples innovation. As a reminder to
all you Zealots Apple, the computer company, pulled out of their tail slide by
ABANDONING their, "in house" home grown solutions and going with an
Open Source "BSD based" design. In fact, early on they seemed to
embrace the "many developer" based community. Then as they succeeded
it became the "Walled Garden". Judging from their current "go
nuclear" approach to litigation it is beginning to like a prison camp. In
the interim, I will continue to work on finding the prior art in Apple Patents
and providing it to the unfortunate souls who get sued by Apple for violating
their rectangular shape with rounded corners.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

how can galaxy phone look like iphone?
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 09:02 PM EDT
The only 3.5 inch samsung phones are things like the galaxy 5 and they dont
look anything like an iphone. The S2 had a 4.3 inch screen for goodness sake.
Compared to a 3.5 inch iphone youd have to be totally mentally defective to
confuse them. Especially since the samsung has big silver word samsung
along the top.

This is nuts. There is nothing in an iphone or ipad that apple invented that i
am
aware of. Everything in them was other peoples inventions i believe. Gps
ohone, camera phone, touchscreen, voice control, notification bar, music
player and so on. All the work of non apple employees to the best of my
knowledge apple are arogant a$$'s and ill do all in my power to stop our uni
and everyone i know from buying their stuff.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Samsung will have to learn its lesson
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 27 2012 @ 05:41 PM EDT
<blockquote>They each have a different feel and
appearance</blockquote>

That's why after driving a Ford with an H pattern shifter and a manual clutch,
you get out and say that was alright.

Lets look at the Chevy... you lift the gull wing door, climb onto the bench seat
(ducking under the roof mounted gear shifter of course with its inverted S
pattern shifter, with the RPM gauge built into the knob.) You sit down, put your
left foot on the left accelerator pedal, your right foot on the turn signal
indicator swivel pedal, your left hand reaches up to the shifter, and your right
goes on the steering octagon, equipped with a paddle to operate the clutch.
Braking of course is accomplished by pushing on the steering octagon, while
accelerating is done by pulling on it.

Oh wait... no... they are nearly identical. If you can operate one, you can
operate the other without needing more than a few seconds to look at the dash.
Your feet settle automatically on the pedals, your hands drop to the steering
wheel, you start the car and drive away. Your fingers automatically flick the
turn signal lever as you approach the first turn without even consciously
thinking about it.

What exactly was your point again? Because generally cars are so similar I can
land in a foreign city, hop into a rental car of a make and model I've never
experienced before, and I can drive it off the lot within a few seconds
operating it with muscle memory and instinct rather than conscious effort.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Good analogy, except for the reverse
Authored by: miltonw on Monday, August 27 2012 @ 06:13 PM EDT
I remember when the 1990 Toyota Camry came out. I liked the look. At that time it was distinctive and unique. I bought one. Not too long after, Honda came out with a car that had the exact same shape. It was so similar that, from a short distance, you could not tell if it was Toyota or Honda. Then other car manufacturers came out with the same or similarly shaped cars. It was a very popular shape.

Did Toyota sue? Did Honda try to sue Toyota? Did any car manufacturer sue anyone over that shape? No. And everybody still survived just fine, customers weren't confused and nothing bad happened.

According to you, major crimes have been committed and someone has got to "learn a lesson".

I think Apple is the one that needs to learn a lesson.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Samsung will have to learn its lesson
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 09:08 AM EDT
Obvious troll is obvious...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )