|
|
|
| Authored by: jheisey on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 05:13 PM EDT |
| The absence of damage reports is particularly noticeable. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 04:26 AM EDT |
Even this immediate case isn't quite over - there's still motions pending and
this is crazy enough it might fall under "no reasonable jury"
territory - we'll see.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 27 2012 @ 03:58 PM EDT |
If Alsup were the judge, they'd have broken it down to just a few patents out of
the whole bunch, the damages would not be absurd, the jury would have had only a
few questions to consider, so it hopefully would not have been so inconsistent,
and he wouldn't have been at his wit's end the whole time due to being buried in
legal papers for having let the cast spiral out of control.
In short, as strange as it looked the first time I saw him do it, this case
shows the absolute brilliance of how he hacked a potentially gigantic case into
something manageable.
Other judges would do well to learn from his example. Unless, of course, they
like getting buried in paperwork.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
