decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
"Copy" ... more | 871 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
"Copy" ... more
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 08:47 AM EDT

RAS - Your comment explores the angle where someone may be coming in with little or no history in a particular market segment. I was relying on the fact that Samsung has a lineup of previous products that show a convergence with Apple's products.

Some of this furball reminds me of the early days of the IBM PC where a competitor built their own BIOS using the published specification and a "clean room" / "Chinese wall" approach to software development*. One could argue that by selling the iPad and iPhone Apple has published the specifications. The various patents themselves are also a form of publication.

I boil this dog's breakfast down with a simple test : Where is the truly unique hardware ? CPU ? No, it's just a variation on the ARM architecture. RAM, radio, sensors, and battery are all pretty much the same. Apple's latest display is unique but comparable displays are available. So the only substantial difference is the software which is readily matched given the number of clever programmers out there.

I'm not saying that one could (or should) copy iOS. But given Android as a starting point one could build a functional equivalent of iOS fairly quickly**. And that is what various Apple competitors have done.

MB94128

* "Cloning the IBM PC BIOS" (Wikipedia article)

**Possible steps : port to new hardware combination, add various features, test, release to manufacturing.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )