Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Anyone detect a pattern here? | 52 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Anyone detect a pattern here?

Authored by: PJ on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 04:41 PM EDT

I detect a pattern. You are in Washington State,
where Microsoft is located. Duh. Go away. Your
comment is too silly for Groklaw.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Anyone detect a pattern here?

Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 26 2012 @ 01:12 AM EDT

And if it turned out that Google was in the wrong, do you
seriously think that the EFF would have stood silent?
You're right that companies give money to non-profits to
"continue what they're doing", but you're wrong in thinking
that it means that they'll only continue it selectively.

Look at it like this:

If company A provides my non-profit with 20% of its income,
and I have the option of writing something that the other
80% of my income will oppose or not, I'm not going to bend
over for Company A. Otherwise, there's a really good chance
that company A will be providing 100% of my income, and they
won't have increased their amount at all (in OTHER WORDS, I
will lose 80% of my income).

Have a great day:)
Patrick.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )