[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

There's a blog post by Mike Masnick at techdirt wherein he expresses surprise that he is listed as a contractor of CCIA who has written during the pendency of the action. See Apparently I'm A Google Shill And I Didn't Even Know It.

There's a docstoc display of Oracle v. Google docket item 1240. For those of us without a docstoc account, I'm sure it will be featured on Groklaw soon. It isn't available as yet on the Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc. Justia page.

There doesn't appear to be any smoking guns in the disclosure and Google says they used none of the articles by any of those mentioned in their briefs other than the book Interfaces on Trial 2.0, which was submitted for publication prior to the pendency of the case.

Oh, and Google reiterates the disclaimer they paid anyone to write about the case. No sign of a further filing by Oracle, also covered by the order for an expanded reply, if clarification warranted.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

• Mike Masnick's download resolves to - - Authored by: dio gratia on Friday, August 24 2012 @ 09:31 PM EDT
• AllThingsD haz got cheezeburger - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 24 2012 @ 10:57 PM EDT
  • A little interesting history - Authored by: dio gratia on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 12:14 AM EDT
• Oracle v Google Shills witchhunt Google expanded report available - Authored by: PJ on Friday, August 24 2012 @ 11:57 PM EDT