|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 24 2012 @ 08:03 PM EDT |
What about the iPod touch? They seem to imply that apple
infringed on it but then they skip the next question.
everything looks hurried to me.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 24 2012 @ 08:07 PM EDT |
"Judge Koh now back, noting that there are at least two problems with the
verdict. One count, for example, found damages for a product in which their was
no finding of infringement. In another, the jury found inducement, with no
finding of infringement, which appears
inconsistent."
http://allthingsd.com/20120824/samsung-found-in-violation-of-app
le-patents/[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, August 25 2012 @ 06:55 AM EDT |
The same products, the same questions, totally different
outcomes. Can somebody be punished when no objective way exists
to determine that somebody has infringed. Looks me to go against
the principles of justice itself.
And of course the difference between South Korean and US
conclusions on the same day, between the treatment of RIM (who
first commercialized the smart phone an probably invented that
commercial concept) and Apple in patent litigation suggest more
and more we are dealing with a vehicle of protectionism. Even
none of both products is made in the US.
OK, the proceedings are not finished in the US, but with trade
bans, the effects may already be present. If I where Samsung I
would take a look also to the WTO rules. This does not look like
a proper, impartial way to treat non us competition.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
