decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
How very depressing | 289 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I think you may be right
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 24 2012 @ 08:41 PM EDT
The average person on the street does not understand what happened here. They
look at round-cornered rectangles and then see a patent and say "well, the
USPTO granted it, so it must be rocket scientist."

However, technical people do understand what happened here. Apple got the USPTO
to grant patents on stuff they never invented, then a jury decided that patents
cover ideas and not implementations, and Apple got a bunch of money. Apple is a
lying, decietful bully, that only won by virtue of their falsified patent
applications for stuff they never invented.

I for one will never buy anything from Apple ever again. A lot of people will
think twice before working with Apple for fear they will steal their ideas and
then turn around and sue them. And the jurors will pay more for their phones
for years to come.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I don't think this is good news for Apple
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 24 2012 @ 08:59 PM EDT
Microsoft never had the mass of lemmings that apple has.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

How very depressing
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 24 2012 @ 09:17 PM EDT
A very sad day for all, and a monstrous injustice.

I actually admire Apple's product very much, but wouldn't
dream of wasting my money on it when there are very
different and superior products from Samsung.

And after this, I feel a strong animosity towards Apple. I
wonder how many others feel that.

All credit to Apple's legal team, though, for their
brilliant sleight of hand. Shame they had to be working for
the
bad guys.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I don't think this is good news for Apple
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 24 2012 @ 09:27 PM EDT
I am typing on a dying MacBook Pro. When it dies, I will buy a laptop from
System 76 and run Linux. I am ashamed to carry an Apple product. I am also
ashamed that I converted 4 people from Windows to Mac in the past few years. I

won't be doing that anymore.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )