|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 30 2012 @ 08:01 PM EDT |
http://groklaw.net/article.php%3fstory=20051109115627950 You don't even
have to read the whole contract, PJ has a couple of salient paragraphs in the
article. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: PJ on Friday, August 31 2012 @ 02:23 AM EDT |
No. Two reasons.
1. SCO Group, previously known as Caldera, was not a party to the contract.
That was SCO, the original, which continued to exist under another name.
2. The contract between SCO and IBM said that if SCO sold, then IBM had the
right to end the contract, and when SCO sold assets to Caldera, IBM wrote a
letter to SCO the original saying it elected not to continue the contract.
So Project Monterey is dead as a doornail. Even if neither of the two points
above were true, it still wouldn't matter, because it's the law of the case that
it's too late for SCO, even the original, to sue. The statute of limitations ran
out. It also stipulated that any disagreements had to be settled in NY.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|