Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

New ad tech to match your Farcebook identity with others' customer data | 279 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

New ad tech to match your Farcebook identity with others' customer data

Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 31 2012 @ 04:08 AM EDT

Excuse the bold text, it wasn't in the preview. I _know_ I didn't use any
<b>s in there. *shrug*

- O4W

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

New ad tech to match your Farcebook identity with others' customer data - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 31 2012 @ 06:16 AM EDT

New ad tech to match your Farcebook identity with others' customer data

Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 31 2012 @ 08:08 AM EDT

>which is why I don't think the new mis-feature is particularly earth-
shattering

If it lives up to the promise of "advertising that is truly relevant to
you,the reader", then it might be OK.

My guess is that it will simply offer more products that are completely
irrelevant to one. For example, serving up adds for automobile insurance
to a blind person that has never owned any form of transportation.

>so they keep picking up the cookie from a quick price check she made
months ago

Run a cron job that deletes cookies and other debri from websites, once
an hour.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )