decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Kickstarter | 279 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Corrections here
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 06:04 PM EDT
If any.

---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Comes docs here
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 06:05 PM EDT


---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | # ]

News Picks commentary here
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 06:07 PM EDT
Please include a link to the article you
are referencing.

---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | # ]

OT here
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 06:10 PM EDT
Please make any links clickable.

---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCO Group (TSG) Now Officially in Chapter 7, with Cahn Still at the Helm ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 06:30 PM EDT
What is the impact to former business contract partners of SCO that had a
bankrupcy clause in their contracts? For Example, does Microsoft now get a
unlimited SCO Unix license?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Well... With Cahn still at the helm...
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 06:30 PM EDT

There goes any hope for any examination into potential wrong-doing by the company leadership.

I guess that leaves us with the odds of 1 in a zillion that some Government body will investigate.

That's too bad. Now there's nothing in place to provide incentive for individuals like Darl not to do the same thing again.

RAS

[ Reply to This | # ]

Why Cahn?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 06:46 PM EDT
I don't understand this part. Given the OUST's emphatic language in its original

motion to convert, and their pressuring TSG to change the filing to prevent them

from appointing Cahn themselves, I thought they had made their antipathy
towards Cahn very clear. What am I missing?

[ Reply to This | # ]

  • Me too... - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 07:22 PM EDT
  • Form Must Be Followed - Authored by: sk43 on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 07:39 PM EDT
  • Why Cahn? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 31 2012 @ 06:52 AM EDT
SCO Group (TSG) Now Officially in Chapter 7, with Cahn Still at the Helm ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 06:58 PM EDT
could someone like IBM NOW buy them - get the records and start sueing people
???

[ Reply to This | # ]

  • Records? LOL - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 31 2012 @ 11:33 AM EDT
    • Records? LOL - Authored by: PJ on Friday, August 31 2012 @ 12:10 PM EDT
Who might be interested in the litigation assets.
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 07:08 PM EDT
Assets? Sure, in an alternate universe, I could suppose.

My question is: Can anyone buy these assets, if so, can IBM buy them?

[ Reply to This | # ]

So SCO dies, but the lawsuits may live on?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 08:15 PM EDT
Why do I have this nasty feeling that someone will buy the lawsuit and continue
it forever? I mean, that's what we've come to expect from SCO: litigation
until the sun goes dark and the moon shines red like blood.

[ Reply to This | # ]

foregone conclusion
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 30 2012 @ 02:09 AM EDT
The foregone conclusion was that the bankruptcy judge would oblige
with Cahn's wish to be re-appointed.

Cahn was now appointed Chapt. 7 trustee but not by the judge rather by the
US Trustee. And the judge made him revise his request. Looks like the judge
has lost some of his old enthusiasm for his retired colleague.

[ Reply to This | # ]

red - SCO Group (TSG) Now Officially in Chapter 7, with Cahn Still at the Helm ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 30 2012 @ 05:20 AM EDT
So,

We can assume you are wearing the red dress?


Boise and Schiller should buy the litigation. Only way they have a
prayer of re-cooping their expenses.

Clicky Maker -not logged in.

[ Reply to This | # ]

litigation rights
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 30 2012 @ 06:01 AM EDT
Doesn't Yarro get the litigation rights now, seeing as presumably Chapter 7
means SCO will default on its debts?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Can one sell "standing"?
Authored by: Steve Martin on Thursday, August 30 2012 @ 06:22 AM EDT
The thought that comes to my mind is that, in Chapter 7, one sells the company's
assets and shuts the company down. As we know (and as acknowledged by the TSG
Group), the only remaining asset they have is the rights to the litigation.

But one cannot prevail in a lawsuit if one does not have standing to bring the
suit. So that makes me wonder: can "standing" to pursue this
litigation be sold as an asset? We know that litigation rights can be
transferred as part of a total transfer of assets with the purchase of a company
as a whole, but can standing to sue be sold in and of itself?

We know that several of the Righthaven lawsuits were dismissed due to
Righthaven's lack of standing to bring the litigation, based on the Courts'
determinations that the right to sue could not in and of itself be transferred
in a sale. So how would The TSG Group trying to sell off the rights to a lawsuit
be different?


---
"When I say something, I put my name next to it." -- Isaac Jaffe, "Sports Night"

[ Reply to This | # ]

Terminal mode in Chap 7
Authored by: hAckz0r on Thursday, August 30 2012 @ 07:33 AM EDT
Now that SCO is in the terminal chap7 mode I would expect Yarro to make his move to pick up all the "evidence" to keep it out of prying eyes. But what if that stuff actually had value? What if someone actually offered to buy the Corporate records to make it all available to the public?

Think Kickstarter.

Would the Court be obligated to recover funds so as to pay creditors rather than hand things over to Yarro? Consider the fact that all the shady deals and NDA's with companies like MS will all be in there. What kind of value could there be to uncover that kind of information? Email too. What kind of message would that send to other abusive companies wanting to sue the world or attack FOSS?

Yes Apple I'm thinking about you.

---
The Investors IP Law: The future health of a Corporation is measured as the inverse of the number of IP lawsuits they are currently litigating.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Cahn man
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 30 2012 @ 10:37 AM EDT
The Cahn Man can still squeeze a little bit more cash for
himself from the dry SCO Corps.

[ Reply to This | # ]

taps
Authored by: BJ on Thursday, August 30 2012 @ 01:22 PM EDT
... comes to mind, and not for just one reason.

bjd


[ Reply to This | # ]

Source for filings with epiq page gone?
Authored by: benw on Thursday, August 30 2012 @ 02:11 PM EDT
Now that this case is no longer Chapter 11, Epiq Systems has taken it down from
their site. Is there an accessible source for case filings now?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Records ...
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 30 2012 @ 06:21 PM EDT
I don't want to buy the litigation assets, I want someone to

[ Reply to This | # ]

So where is Darl now?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 30 2012 @ 08:36 PM EDT
All this makes me wonder: what ever happened to Darl McBride?

Is the SCO Information Minister out there somewhere, running some other company
into the ground? Did he go to work for Microsoft or somewhere like that?

Inquiring minds want to know!

[ Reply to This | # ]

Kickstarter
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 31 2012 @ 12:54 PM EDT
Let's chip in and buy the litigation rights. No, seriously.
How much could they possibly be worth?

I have $5 I'll contribute..

[ Reply to This | # ]

Secure Boot thought
Authored by: kawabago on Friday, August 31 2012 @ 02:56 PM EDT
Secure boot presumably will not allow booting from a CD or
USB drive. When Windows breaks, it is inevitable, how can you
fix it if tools can't be loaded? One bad update from
Microsoft could brick millions of PCs.

[ Reply to This | # ]

  • No biggie - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 31 2012 @ 03:26 PM EDT
  • Secure Boot thought - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 31 2012 @ 04:48 PM EDT
SCO Group (TSG) Now Officially in Chapter 7, with Cahn Still at the Helm ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 31 2012 @ 05:04 PM EDT
Drive that stake long, hard and deep so that it will not rise again!

[ Reply to This | # ]

If you buy the suits, do you also buy the countersuits?n/t
Authored by: jsoulejr on Saturday, September 01 2012 @ 09:46 AM EDT
n/t

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )