Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Ammo for appeal | 151 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Ammo for appeal

Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 23 2012 @ 10:36 PM EDT

Wow, it occurs to me that this is exactly what has happened. I suspect that
maybe 1 or 2 people have strong opinions and everyone has agreed to defer
judgement to them because they don't care.

Imagine having to be unanimous on 600+ questions. Even at 5 minutes per
question, that puts us around 50 hours. If they have asked for extra time
because they think they can be done by tomorrow, it means they have timed out
how long it's taking them to get through the questions.

If they are finished by tomorrow, I suppose this will be a huge amount of ammo
for appeal. The lawyers will have done the math and shown that the jury spent
little time on the decision.

I would like to also go ahead and predict that a quick judgement favors Samsung.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Ticking the Boxes

Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Thursday, August 23 2012 @ 10:56 PM EDT

Yep.

It still results in a net defeat for Apple.

And they will appeal.

---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )