Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 23 2012 @ 06:50 AM EDT |
...effectively extend USA law abroad thus disenfranchising foreign
citizens such as myself - who are unable to vote out the US congressmen who vote
for these unfair pieces of legislation!
Fancy coming to a Tea
party, say in Boston?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 23 2012 @ 07:54 AM EDT |
Apple has spent this trial trying to convince the jury that it is
difficult for a consumer to tell the difference between an iPhone and an Android
Phone. Why didn't they bring in iPhones and Samsung phones (as configured by
the shops) and let the jury have a play with them!
I guess
you haven't been following this story that closely. That is exactly what was
done. The jury has all of Samsung's alleged infringing devices in the
deliberation room with them along with some Apple iPhone and iPad devices that
were allegedly copied. They were instructed to look at them, turn them on, and
compare them, to see for themselves if the Samsung phones violated any of
Apple's design patents or trade dress. They were also given explicit
instructions on how to connect them to the courthouse wi-fi system, and to not
install any new software or accept any software updates that they might be
prompted to install so that they are comparing the devices as shipped.
I do
agree with you that any reasonable jury should be able to tell the difference
easily and therefore find that there was no market confusion created by the
similarities in design.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: DannyB on Thursday, August 23 2012 @ 01:46 PM EDT |
Out the other side of their mouth, Apple fanboys will go on and on about how
inferior Android is. How difficult it is to use. Etc.
So which is it?
Is it the same, or is it different?--- The price of freedom is eternal
litigation. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|