decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
apples, mandarins and sour grapes | 248 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
apples, mandarins and sour grapes
Authored by: stegu on Wednesday, August 22 2012 @ 03:45 PM EDT
"Having a case" does not mean you are right,
only that you have some chance of winning.
Even being factually right does not guarantee
a victory in court. I do not envy the jury
their job. Regardless of the outcome of their
deliberations, we should probably expect the
appeals from both sides to continue for years.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

apples, mandarins and sour grapes
Authored by: DannyB on Wednesday, August 22 2012 @ 04:10 PM EDT
A number of people seem to do this, including some of my friends.

Apple, a real or wannabee monopolist? Control freak? Temper tantrums? Vowing
"to our utter destruction" with stockholders' money?

Apple may have style, but it has inferior technology (today). And I cringe at
saying that. I was an Apple fanboy back in the days when it was so far ahead in
technology. Sadly, that was a very different Apple. Today's Apple is about
style. Their phone/tablet OS doesn't even have a real managed runtime with
garbage collection. And is programmed in only one primary language, which is
obscure at that -- an artifact of NeXT. (Yes, I know there are secondary
languages -- but they are a lot more "secondary" than the alternate
languages that can be used on Android.)

Based simply on principle, I have no problem saying Apple is an evil monopolist
that wants nothing less than to destroy any and all forms of competition. Apple
considers the entire mobile phone and tablet market to be God's exclusive gift
to Apple by divine right. Apple doesn't have to take licenses to FRAND patents,
because Apple is special. (How's that for hypocrisy?) Apple can, and has,
stolen from others (and this is all good by Steve Jobs own words) but woe be
anyone who designs an icon with a phone handset (to mean phone call) and green
background (to mean "go" or "action").

I am dismayed at people whose views I value giving Apple a free pass.

I am a Google fanboy and I don't give Google free passes.

I just don't get the "see no evil" treatment that Apple seems to get.
In my view this makes them even *more* evil than the evil that they *actually*
*are*.


---
The price of freedom is eternal litigation.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )