decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Google: Time to ditch our current software patent system? | 248 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Actually, we should allow corporations to vote
Authored by: argee on Tuesday, August 21 2012 @ 09:15 PM EDT
If I run a man over with my car, and kill him; I am asked
to pay $200,000 in damages.

Therefore a human life is worth $200,000.

As an example, then, if Apple's worth is $600 billion,
they should be allowed to cast 3 million votes. They are
headquartered in California? Then they ought to be able
to cast their votes in Cupertino, California.

That will take care of all those pesky people that want
to put a rein on corporate profit. They are only
the consumers, generate nothing. All wealth is generated
by corporations or by trade in Wall street, so why should
we allow the riff-raff to dictate how the government is
run?

Its time Corporations woke up and propose amendments to
the laws, constitutions and the like to bring them into
alignment with international finance and wealth.

---
--
argee

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Google: Time to ditch our current software patent system?
Authored by: cjk fossman on Wednesday, August 22 2012 @ 01:03 AM EDT
The system may be influenced by money, but Google has plenty
of that.

More than Apple? Who knows? But I predict Apple is going to
bleed some over Motogoogle's latest move.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Google: Time to ditch our current software patent system?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 22 2012 @ 04:51 AM EDT
"Unless this is corrected any reform efforts that come through that system
are likely to become corrupted to serve only the interests of large corporate
political donors."

The problem is that it isn't in the interests of the large political donors to
correct it.

I believe the term is "Positive Feedback Loop".

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Google: Time to ditch our current software patent system?
Authored by: belboz on Wednesday, August 22 2012 @ 11:11 AM EDT
Interesting that the specific items Google want to change
mostly benefits themselves.

1) Shorten patent life. (benefits all innovators. Hurts
trolls.)
2) Fine someone filing a suit and loosing (hurts trolls)
3) Forbid abstract patents that patent doing something on-
line. (hurts everyone having a patent in a market google
wants to enter)

I would really, really have liked if they said: "Kill SW
patents. Kill Business process patents".

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )