decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Alternative explanation | 79 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Alternative explanation
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 21 2012 @ 06:42 AM EDT
Actually he did seem to have bought that GSII for ulterior
reasons. He's never said anything good about Samsung or the
GSII. He has constantly only used it as an example of the
"Copyist" Samsung's infringing of both Apple's and Microsoft's
patents. Does that sound like someone who bought the phone
because of it's features?

What about his insistence that even what he had consider a
more perfect judicial system in Germany, to only turn around
and start bad mouthing it once they didn't make decision that
were in line with his views. Plus.... he knows absolutely
nothing about FRAND or SEPS in the first place. He's what is
called a..... HUMBUG, FAKE, FRAUD, IMPOSTOR and paid Shill or Gypsy Barker
against the Open Source Community.

All you need do is read some of the stuff that's been written
about him on OS NEWS to realize that. For them, he had them
convinced by his Blog name being FOSS Patents. But everything
he wrote was against anything connected with Open Source.

Also remember, he has never.... not even once said anything
good about Google. If he isn't a Sycophantic hater... then
what is he and when if ever has he said anything good about
Google! Never! .....I rest my case!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )