decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more... 		decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

Donate Paypal

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
makes it really hard to be a person | 122 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
makes it really hard to be a person
Authored by: jesse on Tuesday, August 21 2012 @ 05:41 AM EDT
with "knowledge of the art" when the language used is NOT "of the
art".

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

This is not really a problem in patents
Authored by: TennSeven on Tuesday, August 21 2012 @ 06:29 AM EDT
Even though patents are written by attorneys (who also must
be engineers or scientists) and therefore *may* contain more
"legalese" (it really depends on the attorney's writing
style), the USPTO Examiners who vet them are skilled in the
particular science of the patent and are *not* trained as
lawyers. This process tends to filter out terms that would
be understood only by a lawyer.

Additionally, an examiner that is not asleep at the wheel
will always require that any terms of art that do make it
into the patent, are adequately defined. Most attorneys I
know (including me) accomplish this by including a separate
section of definitions, while others define terms as they
are introduced in the text.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details ) 		Site layout based on Woodlands theme by Bryan Bell.
Groklaw logo by John Crowley.
News Picks logo by Ted Thompson.
Powered By GeekLog
Created this page in 0.03 seconds