decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
GPUs and FPGAs | 178 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
GPUs and FPGAs
Authored by: dio gratia on Saturday, August 18 2012 @ 08:06 PM EDT
Offsetting the lack of independence in programming FPGAs every major vendor
offers their tools for free. The draw back is that you are constrained to
adopting their methodologies.

Some number of years ago a University project involving evolutionary programming
to in this case a distinguish between the spoken words 'yes' and 'no'. It
required knowledge of the bitstream programming format that may no longer be
available today. They discovered the resulting programs (designs) were
individual device specific, depending on specific AC timing characteristics
instead of the usual speed bin grading.

In this case you'd realize the ability to innovate led to no useful results.
That might not always be the case and the long lag time between a pent up need
such as incremental programming and when that need is met by the vendor could be
seen to slow down innovation.

There was also a high number of patents around FPGA architectures around 2000,
influenced by reconfigurable computing that stifled FPGA use, along with a
number of patents in telecommunications that might have made today's smart phone
patent wars appear mild in comparison.

The answer to the threats blocking innovation is publishing prior art and
getting a ground swell of interest in applications. You could recognize the
concurrent inability of the lone inventor to practice their related art. For a
while we were seeing universities producing their own silicon then locking up
the use behind patents and of course not gaining any traction and perishing in
the marketplace.

I'd contemplate patents as being the major block to innovation, along with
things like the DMCA. There's also a certain amount of secrecy on internal
structure for purposes of competition as well as likely hiding detail from
exposure to patent litigation when tens of thousands of patents are granted in
related art each year. And as our old friend Solon was want to say 'Who
benefits?'.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )