decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Speaking of Rectangles with Rounded Corners, What About Soylent Green's Tablet? ~pj | 157 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Speaking of Rectangles with Rounded Corners, What About Soylent Green's Tablet? ~pj
Authored by: PJ on Saturday, August 18 2012 @ 03:11 PM EDT
We didn't follow this case closely, but one thing I do know is that there have been some games played in discovery. Apple has been sanctioned for withholding stuff, and you can read about one example in the first 60 or so pages of this hearing transcript [PDF], where Samsung had sent notices of some topics they wanted Apple as a company to answer, and Apple refused to discuss it or comply, saying it was too many topics. That made a motion to compel necessary -- more time lost -- in a case that Apple had asked to be handled super fast as to discovery.

Not haveing read every word, I can't predict a thing or explain much, but one thing I think we can assume is that if Samsung loses, the discovery games will show up in the appeal as to what Samsung was or was not allowed to present to the jury. This discovery dispute isn't ended here.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )