|
|
|
| Authored by: jplatt39 on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 01:56 AM EDT |
Please indicate the mistake in the title as in
Mistake -> Correction[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: jplatt39 on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 01:58 AM EDT |
| Please make your title the same as the news feed title. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: mirrorslap on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 02:00 AM EDT |
Larry Ellison is going to have to get out his wallet! I hope he didn't leave it
on the
Lanai...
Tomorrow's the big day for "Judge Alsup Orders Financial Disclosure of Ties
to
Commentators in Oracle v Google". Will this be happening in open court?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: jplatt39 on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 02:02 AM EDT |
Please read the Important Stuff at the bottom of the posting page. Making links
clickable (instructions on the posting page) is nice. On-topic posts are
considered passe in this thread.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Is population growth, a Ponzi-scheme? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 03:51 AM EDT
- Helios needs money for medical help - Authored by: David Gerard on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 04:23 AM EDT
- Windows 8 review: Yes, it's that bad - Authored by: Gringo_ on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 08:10 AM EDT
- That good? - Authored by: tiger99 on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 08:31 AM EDT
- Ouch - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 05:33 PM EDT
- Debian Community celebrated its 19th birthday - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 09:52 AM EDT
- Samsung shuts the naysayers up once and for all as its Galaxy Note hits the 10 million sale mark - Authored by: SilverWave on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 09:53 AM EDT
- Germany - File-sharers' details can be handed over for smallest of infringements - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 10:45 AM EDT
- Graphing every idea in history - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 10:59 AM EDT
- Google Files New Patent Lawsuit Against Apple, Seeks To Block iPhone, iPad & Mac Imports To U.S. - Authored by: kh on Saturday, August 18 2012 @ 01:17 AM EDT
| |
| Authored by: jplatt39 on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 02:04 AM EDT |
| [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: IMANAL_TOO on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 05:47 AM EDT |
The number of claims does not equal what they are worth.
So out of 100 claims, 93 claims may be worth $1,000 each whereas 7 claims may be
worth $100,000 each.
Counting claims seems like a crude way of handling it. Parsimonious even.
---
______
IMANAL
.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 08:27 AM EDT |
“EchoStar did not succeed 'on any significant issue' or 'achieve any of the
benefit it sought in bringing suit' under the Communications Act.”
“NDS
was the prevailing party in this litigation and that EchoStar fails to meet the
legal definition of a prevailing party on any of its claims.”
even
though NDS was found guilty on 3 charges.
the U.S. supreme court denied
echostar's petition to review the ninth circuit decision that named NDS the sole
prevailing party.
there is some links to the verdict and decisions here.
suprised they didn't
reference this case, any idea why not? [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 09:57 AM EDT |
I'm not complaining; perfectly smooth playing fields have no friction.
But Google's lawyers are so much better than Oracle's. One side blunders, gets
scolded. The other keeps flipping these brilliant moves.
First Oracle hands the judge the chance to make new law, but it goes against
Oracle. Now the judge get's to team up with another judge on new law for costs.
Again against Oracle.
Oracle seems not to friend themselves.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 12:42 PM EDT |
Wow, whoever the associate, paralegal, intern who was watching
this other case to pull this one out is a genious.
Here's to you anonymous Keker & Van Nest person![ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 19 2012 @ 04:44 PM EDT |
I predict that we'll see an Amicus Curae filed which claims that having to
pay costs on a loosing case will have a Chilling Effect on Copyright Owners
being able to defend their rights. I also predict we'll see an attempt to have
the costs ruling extended to Trademark and Patent cases.
In other words I think that the US Courts will be Really busy.
Me? I like the idea of awarding costs. I think it will cut down on frivolous
litigation.
Wayne
http://madhatter.ca
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Amazing ruling - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 19 2012 @ 11:49 PM EDT
- Amazing ruling - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 21 2012 @ 07:48 PM EDT
|
|
|
|
