decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Amazing ruling | 59 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Amazing ruling
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 21 2012 @ 07:48 PM EDT

I don't think it will have any really strong chilling effects where somebody has a number of fairly strong claims - losing one or two won't trigger an awarding of fees for the defendant. What it will do is decrease cases where the accuser throws a plate of spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks, or deliberately runs up the defendant's legal costs in the hope that they will fold/settle.

This will decrease unnecessary waste of precious court time as well. This is the result of judges refusing to be complicit in the action of companies using the court system for battery while skirting rules against it. The clear message is, just because you've gotten away with sneaking weak patents past the patent office, if that's all you've got in your legal war chest and the opposition can call your bluff, then you will suffer the consequences. If you've got something stronger in your hand, then stick with that and don't waste our time.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )