decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Ahem, ECMA-376? | 86 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Wordperfect or Word
Authored by: Wol on Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 07:59 PM EDT
Actually, WordPerfect files ARE standard - a long established standard.

The current WordPerfect file format was established in 1994 with WP6, and was
widely published so anybody could be compatible.

They designed it so well, that if I create a file with my latest version
(something like v12), somebody who still has v6 (and I do, it just won't run on
XP or later) can read/edit the file no problem!

MS can't even manage *backward* compatibility over that time span, let alone
forward! :-)

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Wordperfect or Word
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 08:38 PM EDT
"Word" is a software application. It supports many formats.

If someone tells me to use a "Word" format, then I can happily use
.odt. Now that ODF is supported in Word, it is in fact a "Word
format."

(I'm not trying to be pedantic. But I think it is important to break people of
the notion that "Word" format automatically means MOOXML or its
predecessors).

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Ahem, ECMA-376?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 10:35 PM EDT
aka .docx or Open Office XML, and which LibreOffice can read, manipulate and
write surprisingly well, modulo some of the terribly obscure compatibility
features like aFChunk?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Wordperfect or Word
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 08:12 AM EDT
The popularity or prevalence of WordPerfect doesn't matter in such an instance;
only that it is good at doing what it does, which for the Legal profession, is
important.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Office To Become Fully Open XML Compliant (at Last) O.T.
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 17 2012 @ 01:59 PM EDT
"Between 2005 and 2008, an unparalleled standards war was waged between Microsoft, on the one hand, and IBM, Google, Oracle and additional companies on the other. At the heart of the battle were two document formats, one called ODF, developed by OASIS, a standards development consortium, and Open XML, a specification developed by Microsoft. Both were submitted to, and adopted by, global standards groups ISO/IEC. But then Microsoft never fully adopted its own standard. Instead, it implemented what it called 'Transitional Open XML,' which was better adapted for use in connection with documents created using older versions of Office. Yesterday, Microsoft announced in a blog entry that it will finally make it possible for Office users to open, edit and save documents in the format that ISO/IEC approved."

Slashdot

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • And - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 21 2012 @ 03:31 PM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )