decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Why do Ecuador protect suspected sex-offenders? | 100 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Why do Ecuador protect suspected sex-offenders?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 01:49 PM EDT
I accept your argument.

I'm from the US and I believe in us as good people. However, our US Government
agencies often bend fingers of other countries to get them to do our bidding.

It was pragmatic according to you for Sweden to take immediate survival needs in
WWII

I think Sweden will do what we want in the case of Assange if it can get its
hands on him, which is send him to the US in due time while making it look as if
their actions is due process. Its reasons will be pragmatic.

Assange released documents which displeased our "Entitled Ones" but
had not effect on Sweden and little effect on the UK.

I think Sweden and the UK wants to please the US so they don't run the risk of
getting their fingers bent backwards. Meaning to say they prefer the carrot to
the stick.

I'll even say that if the US changes it's Executive Branch in November, that
Assange won't be near the big deal to the US that he now is.

I've followed this Assange thing since the beginning. I eventually came to the
point of virtually despising his principles and lack of real character.

What I want to say is the Actors in this Stage Play seem so evil I don't want to
even talk about them any longer at present.

Which brings me to saying: It has been a pleasure discussing things with you and
I want to give you the last word.




[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )