decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Inadvertent errors | 100 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Inadvertent errors
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 02:37 PM EDT

Somehow, I don't think the tax officials will be too upset at an actual inadvertent error. Humans make honest mistakes and even the Tax-Man knows and recognizes that.

I structure my taxes in such a way as to "err on the side of caution", which means if I'm not sure, it gets added and if I've erred it's in the Tax-Man's favor. Quite often the taxes are corrected - and the Tax-Man pays me back the overpayment.

With that kind of history in place, I think if the Tax-Man ends up with an issue where I didn't pay for something I was supposed to.... and he's determined to have me charged, my defending Lawyer will be armed with sufficient information - including the Tax-Man's own records - that the Court will understand.

A "damned if you do, damned if you don't" attitude that one uses to not comply in the first place is just another poor excuse to try and rationalize why one decided not to comply - my humble opinion of course!

I'm with Rocky on this one:

    I will do my best to comply with the appropriate Laws. Knowing that I do not know if I'm 100% in compliance is not an excuse that prevents me from doing my best to comply.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Can I offer a law-abiding counterpoint?
Authored by: rocky on Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 02:58 PM EDT
How many individuals know the precise rate that they are supposed to pay, for each type of product that they purchase?

Apologies in advance for the sarcasm, but here we go: I'm going to answer that question with another question. How many individuals can read and follow the instructions on their state income tax form instead of trying to rely on their own guesses of what they should do? My state forms say to total up the purchase amounts, and apply our 6% sales tax.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )