decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Statement from Koh on Mintz blog. | 201 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Statement from Koh on Mintz blog.
Authored by: mrisch on Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 12:35 PM EDT
no way

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Not likely, happened early
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 04:05 PM EDT
But what is interesting in the context. Here is the 4 comments in chrono order:
Intel lawyer now in front of Judge Koh, raising worries that Samsung expert witness Tim Williams has improperly disclosed Intel source code. Williams called on the carpet.

Whatever he's getting paid, Williams probably thinking it's not enough right now. Koh grilling him for violating non-disclosure agreements.

Judge Koh not letting Williams testify for now until she sorts out the law on experts who have conflict of interest by improperly revealing competitor source code. Samsung atty says Intel very close to Apple in this case, suggests this is an ambush.

"I want to see papers, I don't trust what any lawyer tells me in this courtroom," Koh demands. Right now, the case is Intel and Apple v. Samsung.

Seems to me Judge Koh took the word of the Intel lawyer at face value. I agree with the Samsung lawyer that it is an ambush. What source code from Intel would have any bearing on this case? Seems that if Intel has a beef with this person, they should take it up in a separate case.

---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )