decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
She sure has a hair trigger. | 201 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
update - Looks like dirty trick to intimidate witness
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 06:12 PM EDT
From the allthingsd site:

10:54 a.m.: Asked by the judge the status on the Intel matter, Intel’s lawyer said that the company would seek sanctions and a contempt finding against Samsung but is no longer looking to keep him off the witness stand.

“I was never going to grant that,” Koh said. “That was (an) extreme and unwarranted sanction.”

Even if it was not really an attempt to imtimidate, it sure is clear that Apple would like it if Samsung could bring no witnesses to this trial.

Apple knew before this morning who the witnesses were.

Why did they wait until it was the day for his testimony?

---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

She sure has a hair trigger.
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 15 2012 @ 05:00 AM EDT
Internationally there where many cases Apple vs Samsung. With
different results and appeals. And many headlines. But is there
somewhere an overview with the actual status?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )