decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Star 7 | 188 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Apple sought $30-40 per device from Samsumg
Authored by: stegu on Sunday, August 12 2012 @ 08:47 AM EDT
Not to support Apple's position here (which I think is unreasonable in the
extreme), but PJ's comment on the inconsistency of Apple complaining over
expensive FRAND licensing is a bit like comparing apples to oranges. FRAND
licensing is supposed to make standards-essential patents available to
competitors to create a reasonably level playing field. The Apple case against
Samsung is all about preventing Samsung from competing at all. This is not about
Apple seeking monetary compensation for patents. It's a crusade to crush
Android. It has the opposite effect on me - I just bought the most expensive
Samsung phone I could find.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Interesting article about Apple witness testimony
Authored by: pem on Sunday, August 12 2012 @ 12:53 PM EDT
Forbes: Apple v. Samsung: Don't ever believe what people tell you

About Apple's MIT Marketing Prof. John Hauser arguing that Apple's patented features added $100 to what people were willing to pay for Samsung's phones.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Kirby Ferguson: Embrace the remix (TED Talk video)
Authored by: Gringo_ on Monday, August 13 2012 @ 12:12 AM EDT

I watched the video and the commercial after, but it was an AT&T commercial - not the Samsung commercial PJ says she saw. However, it did feature a smart phone. Though I could not discern the brand name, nor was it mentioned, I would guess it was an iPhone, because it had that distinctive and novel rectangular shape with rounded corners that only an inventive company like Apple would think of.

Anyhow, all sarcasm aside, I think it is great to see these kinds of endorsements for remixing. Kirby Ferguson emphasized the human dimensions, that remixing is as natural as sharing... Well - he didn't mention sharing, but I thought that was a nice touch to add.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Star 7
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 13 2012 @ 07:01 AM EDT
Is it too late for this to be brought forward as prior art?
Did Sun let anyone else know about this, or have one around still. Did Oracle
throw it out with the trash when they cleaned out the Sun offices.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

DOJ Won’t Ask Supreme Court to Review Hacking Case: ramblings
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 13 2012 @ 12:08 PM EDT
"DOJ Won’t Ask Supreme Court to Review Hacking Case":
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/08/computer-fraud-supreme-court/

The law was passed in 1984...


What is the state of affairs when the majority of the population are breaking
the law every day?

What's the definition of Revolution?

I don't know whether to laugh or cry these days.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

What does Apple REALLY want from Samsung?
Authored by: BobinAlaska on Monday, August 13 2012 @ 02:18 PM EDT
This is a well written article. I think it is a shame that Samsung is not able to put the following quote form the article in front of the jury.

"From a mid 1990s interview, Jobs says: "Picasso had a saying, he said: 'Good artists copy, great artists steal'. We have, you know, always, ah, been shameless about stealing great ideas".

Later a dying, and perhaps embittered, Jobs tells his biographer Walter Isaacson: "I will spend my last dying breath if I need to, and I will spend every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong...I'm going to destroy Android, because it's a stolen product. I'm willing to go thermonuclear war on this"."

If you haven't read it yet please do, it is worth it. Clicky for your convenience

---
Bob Helm, North Las Vegas, NV

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple expert shines light...
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 13 2012 @ 05:26 PM EDT
So M$ has "licensed" design patents, with a "no-cloning"
clause to prevent them from actually using the licensed designs?

And Apple offers a "discount" to their licenses if you don't use their
technology?

What about this seems like the licenses aren't about designs or technology?
Sounds like "pay us if you don't, pay us even more if you do".

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Samsung Prospects Dim
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 13 2012 @ 07:31 PM EDT
This Newspick extensively quotes Christopher Carani .
He is an
Invited Speaker: "Apple v. Samsung-Design Patents in Action,"
New York State Bar Association, New York, New York, September 2012
His slide set from a WIPO conference is available as [PDF, 57pp, 5.7MB]
U.S. Design Patents: The Path To Meaningful and Sustainable Protection .
It'd be interesting to hear more of what he says about this case.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )