decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
What I find far-fetched | 353 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
German/Dutch Galaxy Tab case
Authored by: Kevin on Wednesday, August 08 2012 @ 02:44 PM EDT
I presume Samsung and its US lawyers will be <i>legally barred
from</i> making the jury aware of these.

There, fixed that for you. Remember that Samsung is already forbidden from
making certain arguments or presenting certain evidence, because Judge Koh has
found that Samsung committed some procedural errors at an earlier stage of the
case.

---
73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin (P.S. My surname is not McBride!)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

What I find far-fetched
Authored by: celtic_hackr on Wednesday, August 08 2012 @ 04:12 PM EDT
I'm most incredulous about stories of people buying Samsung devices thinking
they are Apple products. At least in every store I've been in you can't walk
into a store pick up an apple product and walk it to the register. If you go
into a store asking for an iPhone and the clerk gives you a Samsung phone, and
you don't notice it, then whose fault is that?
Yours? The clerk's? Samsung's?
It certainly isn't Samsung's fault you got a Samsung phone when you asked
specifically for an iPhone.

According to the case an expert says people return Samsung tablets to Best Buy
thinking they'd bought iPads. But in Best Buy you can't pick up a box containing
a Samsung tablet or a iPad. You can pick up a slip of paper and take it to a
register or a service desk. You'll then be given a boxed item. I've not yet seen
a Samsumg boxed item with an Apple logo on it or an Apple name on it, or the
name "iPad" on it.

I call baloney. It's not possible to buy a boxed item with the name Samsung
write large all over the box and think you're buying an iPad or iPhone.

Best Buy lets consumers bring back tablets and exchange them for more expensive
iPads, because they make more money selling the iPad, and they charge a
restocking fee, and often resell the Samsung device for more than then the cost
they've incurred by having an open box item. It has nothing to do with confusion
and everything to do with greed and lying customers, thinking they are getting
away with something.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

German/Dutch Galaxy Tab case
Authored by: PJ on Wednesday, August 08 2012 @ 08:42 PM EDT
What a hilarious quote from FM about telling
helf truths.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )