decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
So that means | 353 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
So that means
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 09 2012 @ 04:52 PM EDT
The only worthy place for a aggregator site is the garbage dump.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

So that means
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 09 2012 @ 05:02 PM EDT
Does anybody have a list of aggregator sites,?

I'd like to block them from my search results, because tbe triple, if not
quadruple the amount of time it takes to find the data I'm looking for.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

So that means
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 09 2012 @ 05:35 PM EDT
"Aggregator sites"?

In the Open Directory we call these sites "affiliate banner farm
spam".

In mixed company, at least. Other terms may be used sotto voce.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Pan Galactic Garbage Plaster
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 09 2012 @ 06:16 PM EDT
The global nature of the interwebs business is revealed in ways that
the US DoJ doesn't even begin to understand. I'm getting more than
annoyed that Google not only gives me aggregator sites instead
of the source that I deliberately chose my search term for, but these
are geo-located so that I'm lulled into thinking they are local sites.
Nope, they're run from mother ships in the other hemisphere,
but with green curtains preventing me from getting to the real
source.

Even more scary is this one password fits all. I've been logging into
gmail with Eudora in the hope that it would dislocate me from
some of the cross-site nonsense. Got a fright the other day,
gmail logged in via Eudora, use Safari to go to Youtube,
and I'm logged in there too. No, it's not cookies, I've got
a cookie purger and I tested it, it works. Oh, different
username too. Google allows different nyms for different
services, so long as they all use the one password tied to a
unifying account. Might have been cookie crumbs, but my
tinfoil hat tells me they were testing this new service...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

So that means
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 09 2012 @ 08:27 PM EDT
Google only shows your email to you until someone messes up a configuration file
and your email gets cached and served to the next person who does the same
search.

It doesn't even have to be Google's cache or mistake.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

So that means
Authored by: Wol on Saturday, August 11 2012 @ 02:31 PM EDT
"Only my email" what do you mean? Where I am in the "To"
field? That's what *I* meant.

And yes I know the aggregators are trying to get Google to rank them higher. But
the argument Google should be using against them (which can have no sensible
riposte) is that "if the searchers really wanted them, we would have an
economic imperative to rank them higher. We don't want them because our users
don't want them."

And certainly I find them a nightmare because they mostly link to each other -
they poison my searches such that I can't actually find what I want - and if I
want to buy something but can't find a web page that actually sells it that's a
major bug in the search system!

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )