decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Search Widget Not Fixed on Any Android Device! | 353 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Search Widget Not Fixed on Any Android Device!
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 08 2012 @ 06:15 PM EDT
The ability to add and delete any icon or widget on any Home
Screen is always there, built into Android from the get go.
It's the main reason I love it over any other system, with it
even offering 3rd party launchers as well. But what Samsung is
referring to, would be obvious to a more OPEN MINDED JUDGE!

Apparently she's no Open Source Tech Wiz either. Where having
so many choices... it boggles her Simple Minded iOS thinking.
But if she can't even open her mind enough to listen to what
Samsung was saying here, then she's NOT very well suited to be
a Judge on the Patent Case of the Century (as it's been
billed).

So I'm beginning to think either she should be canned or she
just default the case in Apple's favor. So we can get on with
the appeal. No sense in spending tax payer money to put Apple's
competitor out of business here. After-all it's Samsung #1 CiCi
Award for investing in America year after year, that makes it
even possible for Apple to have gotten their iPhone on market
in the first place. But.... this Obama administration really
dropped the ball, when they didn't act to keep the Galaxy Tab
from being Banned as a copy of iPad.

Oh well... guess who won't be spending any of their record $42
Billion on CAPEX this year alone, here in America? For that
matter, it's doubtful that Samsung will ever be spending the
Billions a year, they spent here last year alone, for Apple's
benefit ever again!

Nor will Samsung ever introduce their next generation YOUM
SAMOLED Glass-less Indestructible Mobile Displays for Apple's
use ever here... either. But the Galaxy Tab 10.1 ban is a
supreme travesty of justice, ordered by our court system and
this JUDGE. That even the court in the UK recognized as not
being a copy of the Xerox Copier's iPad Rip Off of the Tablet
PC. From the TRUE Genius behind the Tablet PC... invented by
Roger Fidler and envisioned by him as far back as 1980!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )