decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
No negativity required...just a significant difference in the experience... | 353 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
No negativity required...just a significant difference in the experience...
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 08 2012 @ 05:53 PM EDT
Quite possibly the exchanges have a simple explanation involving nothing shady.

Even a trivial one, like not getting that "cool! You got an i-pad"
from your apple Fanboi friends, after you "saved" a little $$ buying
the off-brand Samsung.

Or discovering the "Samsung" didn't quite work like your
"iphone" or "ipad", and having to remember how to do things
on "THIS" particular platform is a pain in the neck.

I can think of a teen in my own life who was once like that...and I certainly
have my own computing habits, which have taken me awhile to map onto my
iPad...even while I have read a few thousand pages on it.

Of course, this *does* read against confusion.....

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

What I find far-fetched
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 09 2012 @ 08:44 AM EDT
All of the cel phone stores and Best Buy's I've been too have
Apple iDevices in their own little corner away from the other
gadgets. IIRC, Apple admitted that much earlier in the trial
and that should contradict anything they've said about
customers accidentally buying a Samsung instead of an Apple.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Third innocent explanation: Infant mortality (Yup, confusion *is* far-fetched!)
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 09 2012 @ 09:50 AM EDT
Note to self: Remember to place mind in gear and re-read the OP before placing
mouth in motion!

Here's a third explanation for returning a few Samsung devices and getting
iThings instead:

There's a certain amount of infant mortality (early failures in the hands of
consumers) that happens within the return period. The reaction, for at least a
few consumers, is "Curses! Didn't save any $$ with samsung! I want an
Apple!"

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Android phones do the same, but much cheaper
Authored by: IMANAL_TOO on Friday, August 10 2012 @ 07:02 AM EDT
"I'm most incredulous about stories of people buying Samsung devices
thinking they are Apple products."

Huh? Agree!

Why would anyone want to buy an iPhone when there Android phones that do the
same to a much lower price?

This is why Android succeeded so fast. There was no tangible difference. Plus,
you didn't see that ugly logo of Apple or needed to remove your fingers to have
a working antenna!




---
______
IMANAL


.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )