|
|
|
| Authored by: cjk fossman on Wednesday, August 08 2012 @ 02:39 PM EDT |
BS&F and MoFo have both posed arguments that showed a lack of
tech understanding.
Maybe the ignorance is feigned or willful, but it's certainly
been on display.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 08 2012 @ 02:43 PM EDT |
I cannot believe that we as a society are spending so much
time and money thinking of these issues. Have we really become
so petty or were we always like this?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 08 2012 @ 06:54 PM EDT |
Out of box any Android device whether connected to the internet
or not, first requests that the user sign in to their Google
account to access Play Store.
It is also required, that you sign in before the device places
the Google Search Widget on the HOME screen, as well. But you
can easily by pass this to preserve the Out of Box experience,
if you want. So it's only natural that someone from Samsung recognized that the
device used for evidence, showed signs of
tampering! .....that this judge apparently doesn't know about.
Because she'll never have to worry about using an Android
device ever in her life after this trial. Since she'll
obviously go out and purchase a Life Time supply of iPads and
iPhones to make her life ever more simpler.... so as not to
confound her SIMPLE MIND!
That's why Samsung's Attorneys were trying to get it across
that somebody had been fooling with the device. Whether that
was Apple's lawyers or Apple themselves, it's a matter of
public record that they've done this before in the EU against
Samsung.
So if YOU were Samsung wouldn't YOU be suspicious of APPLE?
http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/15/apples-evidence-in-european-
galaxy-tab-injunction-was-seriously-misleading-as-in-false/
If the shoe fits, this judge should be checking to see if
they're wearing it now. But.... I guess Truthful Evidence isn't
required in this country![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
