Authored by: mirrorslap on Tuesday, August 07 2012 @ 06:31 PM EDT |
Way to go, Judge Alsup! There is nothing like a bright light to make the
cockroaches scuttle for the shadows. And some highly-paid attorneys may soon
be able to add "cockroach wrangler" to their list of credits. Run, FM,
run![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 07 2012 @ 06:59 PM EDT |
I thought he was a great Judge, but this confirms he's even a
lot more than even that!!! :D[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 07 2012 @ 07:28 PM EDT |
That is, if it isn't offered to all commentators, then it's a payment.
(Christenson)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 07 2012 @ 08:54 PM EDT |
That is, Judge Alsup pretty clearly thinks the case was on the edge of legal,
wants to discount documentation with a paid viewpoint.
Is he setting up a slander case for Google, or maybe a disciplinary case against
BSF? Or is this additional appeal-proofing of some type? Or simply fodder for
the deliberations on costs?
Supporting statements/Opposing arguments anyone?
(Christenson)
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 08 2012 @ 08:24 AM EDT |
Did Oracle request a disclosure order? Did Google? Did Judge Alsup decide that
it was needed on his own?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- The Judge? - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 08 2012 @ 11:22 AM EDT
|