decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Novell's money? | 155 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Novell's money?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 07 2012 @ 02:45 PM EDT
Legally, wasn't sco/tsg holding Novell's license revenue money "in
trust"? Looks like they spent cash that wasn't theirs to spend, which
suggests criminal nonfeasance (the omission of some act that ought to have been
performed, like paying Novell) or possibly simple embezzlement.

z!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Novell Reservation of Rights? (maybe wrong term)
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 07 2012 @ 07:32 PM EDT
I think that was the term when Novell (trying to do this
from memory) filed in the SCO case, in such a way that they
could go after money that was already paid to professionals.

I wonder if that is part of the appeals process or if that
is something that would cause the Judge to think twice about
keeping the Chapter 11 trustee (who still failed to file a
reorganization plan?), from becoming the Chapter 7 trustee.
(or give Novell right of recourse, maybe long term, too much
sun today)

Thanks

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )