decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
That's ridculous! | 311 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
It is not obvious - false equivalency
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 06 2012 @ 07:37 PM EDT
Bullying was invoked to show that sometimes there is a guilty
party - not to suggest that Big Jake(apple) was beating up on
poor little Jimmy(samsung).

This was to refute the idea that by employing a philosophy of
indeterminacy the conclusion is that both parties are equally
guilty and both are equally right.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

It is not obvious - false equivalency
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 06 2012 @ 07:42 PM EDT
Oh yes there us a bully, but it is not a company. It is a country that believes
that everything in the history of the world have been invented within its
borders.


[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

That's ridculous!
Authored by: Gringo_ on Monday, August 06 2012 @ 11:51 PM EDT

You are arguing these companies are the same, but Apple attacked Samsung, and Samsung is merely defending itself. What would you have them do? Give in to Apple? So by defending themselves, suddenly they are an aggressor like Apple? Give me a break - there is no logic in your comment.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )